I'm going to be a teacher and so I'm taking an EDF class about adolescent growth and development and self-esteem is a big thing for adolescence and if we can encourage girls to stop being so cruel to each other and to look out for one another that might change how girls grow up. We could also try to augment things boys see too so that they stop using the term "you blank like a girl" or using "girl" as a punch line.
Reading
the guerrilla art book and Smith’s comments about legality made me wonder about
the legal issues we might run into. I know we talked a little bit about
companies putting their work out there and we aren’t changing anything, but are
new laws and copyrights going to be written to try and stop people from
augmenting things? Smith also talked about guerrilla art not being permanent,
but does our ability to augment things change that and make it so that it will
be permanent in a way? It seems that some of the fun of guerrilla art is the
fact that it disappears or is taken by someone, but with augmented reality
there’s not the same uniqueness or impermanence.
Also,
these ideas were really cool and I think it’s awesome that people leave books
in public places and grow plants in random places. I just hope that our society
doesn’t become so technology based that we lose the interaction with people
these types of arts describe. You might not get the same out of watching people
look at your art, because you might not know if people can see your art or not.
I also feel like the secrecy behind the whole adventure is kind of taken out
because you have to tell people about it so they have the right app in order to
see your augmented reality. I don’t want to slap augmented reality because I
think it has been really fun, but I also think that for this guerrilla art it
might be better to leave it to the other mediums and to not get augmented
reality mixed up in it.
No comments:
Post a Comment